NTISthis.com

Evidence Guide: MSFID6008 - Evaluate design project outcomes

Student: __________________________________________________

Signature: _________________________________________________

Tips for gathering evidence to demonstrate your skills

The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!

From the Wiki University

 

MSFID6008 - Evaluate design project outcomes

What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?

Identify evaluation criteria

  1. Project brief is analysed to determine key design requirements
  2. Problems or underlying factors to be addressed by the project brief are verified
  3. Communication requirements are identified for the project
  4. Current industry design trends relating to project brief are researched and identified
  5. Workplace and industry standards in relation to design presentation are researched and identified
  6. Quality criteria that apply to design processes are researched and identified
  7. Evaluation criteria are identified
Project brief is analysed to determine key design requirements

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Problems or underlying factors to be addressed by the project brief are verified

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Communication requirements are identified for the project

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current industry design trends relating to project brief are researched and identified

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Workplace and industry standards in relation to design presentation are researched and identified

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quality criteria that apply to design processes are researched and identified

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Evaluation criteria are identified

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Apply evaluation criteria

  1. Drawings, mood boards and all associated documentation are examined to identify all features of the finished design
  2. Finished design is evaluated against original design concept
  3. The design and all specifications are evaluated against project brief to check consistency
  4. The design is evaluated to identify how well elements and principles of design have been applied
  5. The design is evaluated for consistency with current industry trends and influences
  6. The design is evaluated to ensure client suitability, including adherence to time and budget requirements
  7. The design is evaluated for quality and innovative elements
  8. Processes engaged to develop finished design are evaluated for effectiveness in achieving final outcomes
Drawings, mood boards and all associated documentation are examined to identify all features of the finished design

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finished design is evaluated against original design concept

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The design and all specifications are evaluated against project brief to check consistency

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The design is evaluated to identify how well elements and principles of design have been applied

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The design is evaluated for consistency with current industry trends and influences

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The design is evaluated to ensure client suitability, including adherence to time and budget requirements

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The design is evaluated for quality and innovative elements

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Processes engaged to develop finished design are evaluated for effectiveness in achieving final outcomes

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Suggest design improvements

  1. Factors affecting the outcome of the project are examined and documented
  2. Suggestions are made for adjustments to design to increase its ability to meet criteria
  3. Technical design skills are used to reflect evaluation outcomes and communicate improvements
  4. Potential design improvements are identified and tested for viability
  5. Selection, adaptation and introduction of materials, tools, technology and design processes are applied to design improvements
  6. Compliance with intellectual and copyright requirements is observed when incorporating ideas from others
  7. Evaluation report is compiled and produced
Factors affecting the outcome of the project are examined and documented

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Suggestions are made for adjustments to design to increase its ability to meet criteria

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Technical design skills are used to reflect evaluation outcomes and communicate improvements

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Potential design improvements are identified and tested for viability

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selection, adaptation and introduction of materials, tools, technology and design processes are applied to design improvements

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Compliance with intellectual and copyright requirements is observed when incorporating ideas from others

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Evaluation report is compiled and produced

Completed
Date:

Teacher:		 Evidence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assessed

Teacher: ___________________________________ Date: _________

Signature: ________________________________________________

Comments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Instructions to Assessors

Evidence Guide

Elements describe the essential outcomes.

Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element.

1

Identify evaluation criteria

1.1

Project brief is analysed to determine key design requirements

1.2

Problems or underlying factors to be addressed by the project brief are verified

1.3

Communication requirements are identified for the project

1.4

Current industry design trends relating to project brief are researched and identified

1.5

Workplace and industry standards in relation to design presentation are researched and identified

1.6

Quality criteria that apply to design processes are researched and identified

1.7

Evaluation criteria are identified

2

Apply evaluation criteria

2.1

Drawings, mood boards and all associated documentation are examined to identify all features of the finished design

2.2

Finished design is evaluated against original design concept

2.3

The design and all specifications are evaluated against project brief to check consistency

2.4

The design is evaluated to identify how well elements and principles of design have been applied

2.5

The design is evaluated for consistency with current industry trends and influences

2.6

The design is evaluated to ensure client suitability, including adherence to time and budget requirements

2.7

The design is evaluated for quality and innovative elements

2.8

Processes engaged to develop finished design are evaluated for effectiveness in achieving final outcomes

3

Suggest design improvements

3.1

Factors affecting the outcome of the project are examined and documented

3.2

Suggestions are made for adjustments to design to increase its ability to meet criteria

3.3

Technical design skills are used to reflect evaluation outcomes and communicate improvements

3.4

Potential design improvements are identified and tested for viability

3.5

Selection, adaptation and introduction of materials, tools, technology and design processes are applied to design improvements

3.6

Compliance with intellectual and copyright requirements is observed when incorporating ideas from others

3.7

Evaluation report is compiled and produced

Required Skills and Knowledge

Elements describe the essential outcomes.

Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element.

1

Identify evaluation criteria

1.1

Project brief is analysed to determine key design requirements

1.2

Problems or underlying factors to be addressed by the project brief are verified

1.3

Communication requirements are identified for the project

1.4

Current industry design trends relating to project brief are researched and identified

1.5

Workplace and industry standards in relation to design presentation are researched and identified

1.6

Quality criteria that apply to design processes are researched and identified

1.7

Evaluation criteria are identified

2

Apply evaluation criteria

2.1

Drawings, mood boards and all associated documentation are examined to identify all features of the finished design

2.2

Finished design is evaluated against original design concept

2.3

The design and all specifications are evaluated against project brief to check consistency

2.4

The design is evaluated to identify how well elements and principles of design have been applied

2.5

The design is evaluated for consistency with current industry trends and influences

2.6

The design is evaluated to ensure client suitability, including adherence to time and budget requirements

2.7

The design is evaluated for quality and innovative elements

2.8

Processes engaged to develop finished design are evaluated for effectiveness in achieving final outcomes

3

Suggest design improvements

3.1

Factors affecting the outcome of the project are examined and documented

3.2

Suggestions are made for adjustments to design to increase its ability to meet criteria

3.3

Technical design skills are used to reflect evaluation outcomes and communicate improvements

3.4

Potential design improvements are identified and tested for viability

3.5

Selection, adaptation and introduction of materials, tools, technology and design processes are applied to design improvements

3.6

Compliance with intellectual and copyright requirements is observed when incorporating ideas from others

3.7

Evaluation report is compiled and produced

Follow work instructions, operating procedures and inspection processes to:

minimise the risk of injury to self or others

prevent damage to goods, equipment and products

maintain required production output and product quality

Evaluate three (3) design project outcomes, including one (1) residential and one (1) commercial design, against project brief and additional evaluation criteria effectively applying design elements and principles

Use mathematical ideas and techniques to correctly complete measurements, make calculations, estimate material requirements and cost work

Communicate ideas and information to enable confirmation of work requirements and specifications, presentation of design/colour concepts, the reporting of work outcomes and problems

Establish a personal work methodology

Visualise 2-D notions into 3-D space and form

Manipulate a range of relevant computer software programs

Display critical evaluation skills, creativity, innovation, research skills and independent thinking

Experiment in both the planning of projects and methods of execution

Present design ideas

Initiate new ideas and work techniques

Avoid backtracking, work flow interruptions or wastage

Work with others and in a team by recognising dependencies and using cooperative approaches to optimise work flow and productivity

State or territory WHS legislation, regulations, standards and codes of practice relevant to the full range of processes for evaluating design project outcomes

Organisational and site standards, requirements, policies and procedures for evaluating design project outcomes

Australian Standards and the Building Code of Australia (BCA) applying to interior design

Elements and principles of design, including liveability and accessibility

Creativity and artistic relevance

Ergonomics, anthropometrics, proxemics and aesthetic values

Characteristics of materials, products and defects

Design themes and design development

Colours, furnishings and decorations

Product, material and finish types and descriptions

Evaluation and reflective practice techniques

Sketching and drawing techniques

Procedures for the recording, reporting and maintenance of workplace records and information

Appropriate mathematical procedures for estimation and measurement

Environmental protection requirements

Established communication channels and protocols

Relevant problem identification and resolution

Range Statement

Specifies different work environments and conditions that may affect performance. Essential operating conditions that may be present (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) are included. Range is restricted to essential operating conditions and any other variables essential to the work environment.

Unit context includes:

work health and safety (WHS) requirements, including legislation, building codes, material safety management systems, hazardous and dangerous goods codes, and local safe operating procedures or equivalent

work is carried out in accordance with legislative obligations, environmental legislation, relevant health regulations, manual handling procedures, Liveable and Accessible Housing Design guidelines, and organisation insurance requirements

Project brief includes:

client needs and objectives

client aims and objectives, and criteria for evaluation

milestones

organisational or personal profiles and aims

image requirements and function

target market

budget

timeline

consultation requirements

colour requirements

Evaluation criteria includes:

how the design:

achieves project brief

meets budget

meets timeline

meets client needs

meets workplace and industry standards

is suitable for end use and target market

is suitable for current interior design trends and expectations

complies with building standards

applies environmental standards

includes suitable access for people with disabilities and the elderly

Finished design includes:

themes and concepts

fixtures

fittings and interior design products

furniture

soft furnishings and accessories

colour and finishes

specifications

quantities

quality

Elements and principles of design, including liveability and accessibility, include:

balance

similarity

texture

contrast

size

ground, volume

composition

orientation

form

structure

2-D space

position

proportion

3-D space

repetition

scale

line

rhythm

pattern

point

symmetry

tone

plane

Technical design skills include:

sketching and drawing

computer-aided design (CAD) representations

visual documentation

specification